HomeHome SearchSearch MenuMenu Our productsOur products

Important liabilities OHS practitioners face in various legal appointments

by , 14 November 2016
Important liabilities OHS practitioners face in various legal appointmentsA company or an individual may encounter two types of liability. One type is represented by the criminal charges carrying conviction or fines, the second type is represented by the civil claims by damages.

In an analysis for Sheqafrica.com, steam legal consultant Shavanya Subramoney explained the liabilities that OHS practitioners face in various legal appointments and scopes of service.

Today, we're relaying this crucial information to you.


According to the law, Health and safety reps or SHE reps are excluded from both types of liability, in terms of their duties under the Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Act.

When it comes to legal appointments, the general duties are set out inthe OHS Act. If a Section 8(2)(i) supervisor doesn't perform his duties in terms of the Act (which is to take reasonable steps to prevent incidents), he or she will be criminally liable should a workplace incident occur.

In case a supervisor performs his duties (such as reporting a risk to the Section 16(2) manager), and the manager does nothing about it, then the manager would then be liable for an incident, should one occur.

Moreover, if the Section 16(2) manager performs his duties (such as reporting the matter to the Section 16(1) CEO for resolution), and the S16(1) CEO does nothing about it, the CEO would be liable in turn.

Here are the valid principles when it comes to health and safety professional liability

Legal liability in terms of professional health and safety registration in the construction industry would be similar to liability in terms of legal appointments under the OHS Act, explains  Subramoney.

A general duty under the OHS Act would become a specific duty under the Construction Regulations which means that lines of accountability are easier to define by duties, and the liable people would be easily identifiable.


 *********** Recommended For You ***************
 

Yours: 68 legally compliant appointment letters at a click of a button...

 


 ***************************************

According to the previously mentioned source, "the Construction Regulations or any Regulations imposing legal appointments or registrations, do not change the consequences of liability" so "anyone who fails to discharge any duties placed on them in terms of an Act or Regulations could be held liable for incidents that occur". When it comes to employees without appointed health and safety duties, keep in mind that each employee must report unsafe or unhealthy work practices otherwise they can be also considered responsible in case of an injury.

In case a fatal workplace incident occurs, the persons responsible for health and safety may be held liable depending on their duties, and depending on who the deceased was.

"If the deceased was a visitor and did not receive proper induction training, which resulted in the fatality, the person responsible for the health and safety induction training would be held liable.

If there are no health and safety induction procedures, it would be likely that the Section 16(1) CEO would be liable", announced the same source.

Here's how the regulations specify terms of liability

As Subramoney adds, the legal implications of the Construction Regulations Amendment of 2014 made it so that everyone becomes responsible for health and safety. Also, employers remain responsible to ensure that everyone complies with their duties.

External incident investigations by the Department of Labour aim to determine who is responsible for incidents. Note that employers may not tamper with an investigation.

In case registration is expanded to other industries, Subramoney explains, the lines of liability would be clearer and easier to prove, based on duties imposed on specific people.

Warning: Courts can and do seek individual OHS liability

It is a known fact that courts deal with such cases and the OHS Act in a more strict manner in a context where awareness is spreading.

On a final note, it's recommended by the same author that employers should have professional indemnity insurance, or personal indemnity insurance, depending on their business, and whether it has juristic personality.



Related articles




Related articles



Related Products



Comments
0 comments


Recommended for You 

  Quick Tax Solutions for Busy Taxpayers – 35 tax answers at a glance



Here are all the most interesting, thought-provoking and common tax questions
asked by our subscribers over the last tax year – everything from A to Z!

To download Quick Tax Solutions for Busy Taxpayers – 35 tax answers at a glance click here now >>>
  Employees always sick? How to stop it today



Make sure you develop a leave policy to regulate sick leave in your company.

BONUS! You'll find an example of the leave policy and procedure in this report.

To download Employees always sick? How to stop it today click here now >>>
  Absenteeism: Little known ways to reduce absenteeism



This FREE e-report will tell you how you can reduce absenteeism in your workplace while avoiding the CCMA and without infringing your employees' labour rights.

To download Absenteeism: Little known ways to reduce absenteeism click here now >>>
  7 Health & safety strategies to save you thousands



Don't let a health and safety incident cost you one more cent. Implement these seven
strategies in your company today.

To download 7 Health & safety strategies to save you thousands click here now >>>