Of course SARS wasn't happy about this. They assessed De Beers and slapped them with a VAT bill that came up to R29 million – which included the R7 million they claimed and penalties.
The matter went to the Supreme Court. Read on to find the Court ruling and four things you need to know so this doesn't happen to you.
Do you want to minimise your VAT bill?
The Practical VAT Loose Leaf Service
************ Advertisement *************
will allow you to calculate vat efficiently and take advantage of little known, legal, VAT saving strategies
· Explain the latest changes in VAT
· Save you R1000's in time and money
· Tell you how to use specific VAT benefits in practice
· Show you which deductions you can make
· Demonstrate how to deal with SARS audits
· Protect you from typical mistakes made when calculating and paying VAT and how to avoid them
· Show you how to identify legitimate VAT invoices
· Will show you how to keep your VAT payments up to date
Get your copy here…
SARS vs De Beers' – what were the facts of the case?
SARS said De Beers' shouldn't have claimed input tax
on the local services because the services were exempt supplies. SARS also said De Beers were supposed to declare and pay VAT over on the international imported services.
The Supreme Court's ruling
The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled in favour of SARS. It said De Beers was to pay VAT on the 'imported services' and that the VAT on local supplies wasn't claimable as input tax
. The Court said the services relating to De Beers shares were for VAT-exempt financial services. The services had nothing to do with De Beers' taxable diamond mining and selling activities.
So De Beers had to pay some R22 million VAT on imported services. And they weren't entitled to claim the R7 million VAT they paid to local suppliers as input tax
De Beers also had to pay for both SARS' and their legal costs!
Read on to find out four things you must remember about exempt supplies so you don't land up paying like De Beers.
********** Best Seller ***********
In 2016 the government expects to collect R284 billion from VAT, up by 10% compared to 2015.
Considering VAT is the second source of income to the consolidated budget, your 2016 VAT returns are now SARS' favourite target for audits!
Don't let this happen to you.
Attend the VAT Masterclass 2016 and get detailed info on the VAT201 form and how to complete it correctly so SARS doesn't turn its attention on you.
Book your seat today
Four things you must remember about exempt supplies
Here's why SARS demanded R29 million from De Beers:
1. Expenses for the share capital of a company are for exempt and not taxable supplies.
2. De Beers imported services from a foreign supplier. Since these weren't for making taxable supplies, De Beers was supposed to declare VAT on these services.
3. De Beers also couldn't claim input tax
on services supplied by the South African financial experts. This is because this service wasn't for making taxable supplies.
4. The VAT Law clearly states that financial services are exempt from VAT (Section 12(a))
. And the issue or sale of shares a financial service (Section 2(d) of the VAT Act).
So SARS was right to assess De Beers.
Exempt supplies are complicated! To make it easy for you, I've called on top VAT experts to explain in detail what exempt supplies are and how to deal with the VAT on them correctly. Never make the same mistake De Beers made by turning to chapter E01: Exempt Supplies
of the Practical VAT Loose Leaf Service.
Get your copy here.
If you order your copy of the Practical VAT Loose Leaf Service
today, you'll get a no-nonsense 30 day money back guarantee. If you don't feel the Practical VAT Loose Leaf Service
helps you comply with all your VAT and gives you top VAT saving tips. Simply return it to me for a full refund. No questions asked!