HomeHome SearchSearch MenuMenu Our productsOur products

VAT Case Law: Director of Public Prosecutions vs. Parker

by , 19 January 2016
Dear Reader,

Parker, a certain taxpayer, was the sole member of 'Step-in-Time Supermarket CC'. His CC was registered for, and charged, customers VAT. But he never filed the VAT returns. Nor did he pay the VAT over to SARS.

When SARS found out, they said Parker didn't submit VAT returns as required in line with VAT law (Section 28(1)(a) of the VAT Act).

Not only did SARS say Parker contravened the VAT Act, SARS also filed criminal charges of theft against him for the money he collected on SARS' behalf, but didn't pay over. There were 30 counts of charges under the VAT Act, and 16 counts under common law theft!

Read on to find out how Parker fared against the Director of Public Prosecutions and SARS.

****Top advertisement****
The Tax and VAT Case Law Update Breakfast
  • 1 Morning
  • 2 Master tax practitioners
  • 3 Topics
  • 4 Top recent tax and VAT law cases and how you can learn from them!
Johannesburg, 18, March 2016
Book your seat now
SARS files criminal charges against Parker – what were the facts of the case?
SARS argued that once Parker collected the VAT, the money belonged to the State. But since Parker didn't pay it over, he'd stolen it!
The Magistrate's Court sentenced Parker and his CC to a fine of R13 000. He was also sentenced to 5 years in jail. Although the fine was small, the offence is serious!
Not looking forward to 5 years in a cold, damp Western Cape jail, Parker appealed to the Western Cape High Court.
Here's what the Court found…
****You simply must see this!****
How Pretoria East Motors' assessment was reduced from R5 million to R1 million
SARS raised an assessment of R5 million on Pretoria East Motors.
But SARS had made a mistake.
And if Pretoria East Motors didn't fight SARS, they would've paid 4 times what they had to!
Here's what you can learn from this recent top case law, so you can save yourself money!

Parker appeals his 5-year jail sentence
The Court found in favour of Parker. It said it couldn't find Parker guilty of theft.
This displeased SARS and the Director of Public Prosecutions, so they appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
This Court found that although Parker was guilty of offences under the VAT Act, he wasn't guilty of the common law offence of theft. It set aside his conviction and sentence, so Parker won the appeal on the conviction. But he still had to pay the fine.
Don't be caught out evading VAT! Use the Practical VAT Loose Leaf Service to make sure you know and comply with ALL your VAT obligations.
P.S. Did you know crime boss Mark Liffman was charged R388 million for evading tax and VAT by SARS? No one is safe! Join master tax practitioners Victor Terblanche and Tom Jordi for their detailed analysis on 4 top recent tax and VAT cases and find out how to safeguard yourself from SARS.

Vote article

VAT Case Law: Director of Public Prosecutions vs. Parker
Note: 5 of 1 vote

Related articles

Related articles

Related Products